Joe Paterno the revered winning head coach of Penn State is out along with the school president and two other members of the coaching staff because they did not do what people of integrity do. In a statement Paterno said: “This is a tragedy. It is one of the great sorrows of my life. With the benefit of hindsight, I wish I had done more.” Sorrowful words but not nearly enough.
Background
In 1977 Jerry Sandusky, who was on the coaching staff of Penn State, establishes a charity whose stated goal is to help troubled boys. It appears this charity became the vehicle Sandusky used to sexually victimize vulnerable young boys. In 1998, the mother of one of these boys complains to the university police. There is an investigation where Sandusky admits to showering with more than one boy and hugging at least one. He promises to not do it again and there is no action.
In 2000 a janitor reports to his supervisor that he saw Sandusky engaging in sexual activity with a young boy. It is unclear if supervisor reported it to his superiors. It is clear they were afraid that if they did report it they might lose their job.
In 2002 a graduate assistant reports seeing a boy who is around 10 years old being sexually assaulted to Paterno who passed the information up the chain. No report is made to child protective services or the police, a violation of state law.
Nothing is done until 2009 when the mother of a child at a public high school where Sandusky was “helping” contacts the police. . . . .
The headlines are about Sandusky and the Penn State officials who have been fired, but the great travesty is between the victims of Sandusky and the officials of Penn State.
What’s Important?
This happened initially because Sandusky is a terrible person (assuming the allegations are true). It was perpetuated because those in middle and upper management were more concerned about the organization than they were about the victims. They were more concerned about not being hassled and embarrassed than about the lifetime damage being done to what is no doubt dozens of young men.
In senior housing we face these same challenges of integrity while caring for a group of people who are every bit as vulnerable as these boys. There are compelling reasons to sweep problems under the rug because exposing problems to the light of day can result in the loss of revenue, it can open the door to regulatory wrath and can expose the community to litigation. Yet for all of that, integrity is of paramount importance to protect not only the residents of your own community but the entire seniors’ community.
Too often a staff member is “caught” doing something that is abusive to a resident, ranging from neglect or stealing to physical or verbal abuse and the simple solution is to fire that staff member. This is in effect kicks the problem down the road where the resident will find another community to continue their victimization of seniors. These is in effect what Penn state did . . .
Are you committed to putting maximum effort into stopping preventing and reporting abuse? Do your team members know it is safe to report problems? Do they know it is not only safe but you will do something about it? Penn State is a sobering reminder of how sacred our mission is!
A word of thanks to Dan Rockwell who writes the blog “Leadership Freak” for inspiring this blog post.
The facts of the events came from WYNC News
Steve Moran
Don’t miss a single issue of Senior Housing Forum, subscribe today. It is free! We do not sell or share your contact information. The posts are practical and never too long.
Go to the main page of Senior Housing Forum and on the right hand side you will see a place to enter your email to subscribe. You will receive notification when a new article is posted. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Finally: If you know anyone who is looking at emergency call systems I would appreciate the opportunity to talk with them about Vigil Health Solutions.
From LinkedIn Groups
By firing Paterno in addition to the senior leadership at Penn State, the Regents of this University showed lack of integrity. Joe should have been able to stay. The person who had intimate knowledge of at least one of the crimes was Joes assistant coach. The assistant coach should have called the police. Joe did the right thing and although he had no first hand knowledge of a crime he passed along to his employers what he had been told by his assistant. Why did not the assistant coach go to the aid of the victim when he saw the crime occur? Sandusky was an old man and certainly the much younger assistant coach would have been able to help the victim. Headlines around the world and even your post use Paterno as the issue here. He is not.
Posted by Stuart
From LinkedIn Groups
Great article and great thoughts.
Posted by Jeff
Steve Moran • I think you have a good point about the assistant coach, and I predict he too will be gone. The place I would respectfully disagree is about Paterno. I think it was appropriate he be fired immediately. He had to be in on the discussions that forced Sandusky to turn in his keys without anything else being done. As a result there were no doubt dozens of young men who were molested. Paterno was the one guy who more than any other, could have used the force of his influence to stop the abuse.
I would add that I am particularly distressed to see thousands of students protesting the firing. What they are in effect saying is that the football program at Penn State is more important than the victims of this creep.
From LinkedIn Groups
I dont think that the students are saying that at all. The students are upset I believe because the University top level management did not act appropriately and threw Paterno under the bus. The students are second hand victims. Violence and rioting should not happen however. This is not about football. You speculate that Paterno knows more than what has been reported. If so then firing him was appropriate. The police and authorities were aware of Sandusky. It took them three years to unravel the web he wove. There is a great article about the Governor of Pennsylvania knowing about Sandusky years ago when he was prosecuting attorney in todays New York Times. There were many many failures here. I believe Paterno is the fall guy for everyone else until I know of some new information.
Posted by Stuart
From LinkedIn Groups
The current Penn State issue sadly places the spot light on the fact that certain substances can defy gravity and roll up hill. No one in the business universe should feel exempt from this particular quirk in the law of physics.
While it is apparent that the horrible crimes perpetrated on the victims were facilitated by endemic corruption, every organization should take a step back and reassess the steps they are taking to ensure that the “law of gravity” is being applied in an effective manner as possible to prevent things from rolling in the direction that they should not.
Simple assessment and preventative measures starting from the very bottom of the chain of command on up may be all it takes to save an organization and everyone who depends on it. And most importantly, it will help ensure the safety of those in the care and trust of the organization. A major part of this process should be the effective and efficient vetting and pre employment screening of all employees.
Simply meeting the the state’s minimum screening requirements may not be enough. Some of the more poignant questions to consider are:
Does the screening involve a national criminal check?
Many employees are travelers and have lived and worked in various sates and countries. Simply checking the current criminal record in the county in which the currently live will not reveal any possible criminal records that may exist elsewhere in the USA or other countries.
If you are doing national criminal checks, is your current provider identifying past places of residents that may require a traditional physical check of court records because a database check may not be effective in that particular jurisdiction?
Is your current provider providing you with the tools that you need to help reduce your liability when when conducting pre employment screening? Are you provided with adverse action forms, proper release forms, and compliance updates?
The cost and time spent on the vetting process can be miniscule when compared with the heartache and economic impact that neglecting the process can result in.
Enhanced Background checks, LLC may be contacted via email [email protected], or call us:
732-361-4213 and ask for Pete. We will gladly address any questions or concerns.
Posted by Peter
From LinkedIn Groups
Please remember..the cover up is worse than the crime. It gives the perpertrator time to strike again. Every person has an obligation to report any incidence with our very vulnerable people we serve. If it’s our children..or our elder parent’s, everyone has the responsibilty to report abuse to the proper Authority. It can not be tolerated.
Posted by Nancy
Stuart……you’re saying that Paterno should have not been fired? Wow – you have your priorities completely screwed up. He has already admitted being told of the offense back in 2002 and if there is ANY chance of criminal activity having taken place, he should have either called the police himself (if the University President wanted to cover it all up, which is obvious that he did). Any one of these guys at Penn State could have done the right thing, but they choose NOT to. As someone else previously mentioned, the ‘cover up’ is at least as bad, or even worse in many ways, as the original offender. With the clout that Paterno carried around that school, he could have pretty much forced the AD and/or the University President to contact the police. End of story. It sickens me to see so many people rallying around Paterno when there are how many victim’s families of this Sandusky sicko? How come nobody is rallying around those families. These are people that were kids at the time and now they’re adults. God only knows what their lives are like now.